Liberia vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area

Liberia
365.27 USD_PPP/ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
389.98 USD_PPP/ha
in 2024
Liberia rank
158th
Zimbabwe rank
157th

Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area over time

  • Liberia
  • Zimbabwe
100200300400196119922024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 389.98 USD_PPP/ha against 365.27 USD_PPP/ha in Liberia, a difference of 24.71 USD_PPP/ha.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Liberia ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 196 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 238.34 USD_PPP/ha 76.22 USD_PPP/ha 162.12 USD_PPP/ha Liberia
1970s 336.85 USD_PPP/ha 111.25 USD_PPP/ha 225.6 USD_PPP/ha Liberia
1980s 396.72 USD_PPP/ha 120.68 USD_PPP/ha 276.04 USD_PPP/ha Liberia
1990s 270.1 USD_PPP/ha 229.52 USD_PPP/ha 40.58 USD_PPP/ha Liberia
2000s 333.63 USD_PPP/ha 254.01 USD_PPP/ha 79.62 USD_PPP/ha Liberia
2010s 312.64 USD_PPP/ha 297.26 USD_PPP/ha 15.37 USD_PPP/ha Liberia
2020s 340.7 USD_PPP/ha 374.65 USD_PPP/ha 33.95 USD_PPP/ha Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agricultural land — value of agricultural production (int. $) per area, Liberia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 389.98 USD_PPP/ha against 365.27 USD_PPP/ha in Liberia as of 2024.
What is the difference in agricultural land — value of agricultural production (int. $) per area between Liberia and Zimbabwe?
24.71 USD_PPP/ha, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Liberia and Zimbabwe rank globally for agricultural land — value of agricultural production (int. $) per area?
Liberia ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-value-of-agricultural-production-int-per-area/liberia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agricultural-land-value-of-agricultural-production-int-per-area/liberia/zimbabwe/">Liberia vs Zimbabwe: Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agricultural land — Value of agricultural production (Int. $) per Area
Unit
USD_PPP/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
244 places, 14,115 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.