Ecuador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agriculture — Area, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.0215 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0231 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
132nd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
129th

Agriculture — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.020.030.040.050.06196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0231 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0215 1000 ha per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0016 1000 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Ecuador ranks 132nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 129th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0171 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0565 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0394 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0195 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0429 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0234 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0263 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0508 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0245 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0296 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0404 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0108 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0304 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0243 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0061 1000 ha per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0254 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.023 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0024 1000 ha per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0217 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0231 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 ha per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture — area, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0231 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0215 1000 ha per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture — area, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0016 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for agriculture — area, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 132nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 129th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agriculture — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-area-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-area-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Ecuador vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agriculture — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 10,889 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.