Albania vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government) over time
- Albania
- Malaysia
How they compare
Albania currently reports 4,936 million SLC against 2,810 million SLC in Malaysia, a difference of 2,126 million SLC.
That makes Albania's figure about 1.8 times Malaysia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Albania has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 30th and Malaysia ranks 32nd of 93 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,393 million SLC | 2,518 million SLC | 875.18 million SLC | Albania |
| 2020s | 6,016 million SLC | 2,338 million SLC | 3,678 million SLC | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government), Albania or Malaysia?
- Albania, at 4,936 million SLC against 2,810 million SLC in Malaysia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government) between Albania and Malaysia?
- 2,126 million SLC, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Malaysia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Albania and Malaysia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government)?
- Albania ranks 30th and Malaysia ranks 32nd of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.