Angola vs Armenia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government) over time
- Angola
- Armenia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 16,006 million SLC against 11,039 million SLC in Armenia, a difference of 4,967 million SLC.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.4 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Armenia ahead.
Angola ranks 21st and Armenia ranks 23rd of 93 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Armenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Armenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,229 million SLC | 19,920 million SLC | 13,691 million SLC | Armenia |
| 2010s | 21,978 million SLC | 14,439 million SLC | 7,539 million SLC | Angola |
| 2020s | 57,056 million SLC | 10,512 million SLC | 46,545 million SLC | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government), Angola or Armenia?
- Angola, at 16,006 million SLC against 11,039 million SLC in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government) between Angola and Armenia?
- 4,967 million SLC, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Armenia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Angola and Armenia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government)?
- Angola ranks 21st and Armenia ranks 23rd of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.