Argentina vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government) over time
- Argentina
- Malaysia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 7,088 million SLC against 2,810 million SLC in Malaysia, a difference of 4,278 million SLC.
That makes Argentina's figure about 2.5 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Malaysia ahead.
Argentina ranks 29th and Malaysia ranks 32nd of 93 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 955.56 million SLC | 2,518 million SLC | 1,563 million SLC | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 7,238 million SLC | 2,569 million SLC | 4,669 million SLC | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government), Argentina or Malaysia?
- Argentina, at 7,088 million SLC against 2,810 million SLC in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government) between Argentina and Malaysia?
- 4,278 million SLC, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Malaysia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Malaysia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government)?
- Argentina ranks 29th and Malaysia ranks 32nd of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.