Armenia vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government) over time
- Armenia
- South Africa
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 11,039 million SLC against 10,267 million SLC in South Africa, a difference of 772 million SLC.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 24th of 93 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19,920 million SLC | 3,874 million SLC | 16,046 million SLC | Armenia |
| 2010s | 14,439 million SLC | 4,662 million SLC | 9,777 million SLC | Armenia |
| 2020s | 10,512 million SLC | 3,854 million SLC | 6,658 million SLC | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government), Armenia or South Africa?
- Armenia, at 11,039 million SLC against 10,267 million SLC in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government) between Armenia and South Africa?
- 772 million SLC, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Africa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government)?
- Armenia ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 24th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.