Chile vs Paraguay: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government) over time
- Chile
- Paraguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 474,776 million SLC against 239,642 million SLC in Paraguay, a difference of 235,134 million SLC.
That makes Chile's figure about 2.0 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 2nd and Paraguay ranks 4th of 93 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 185,593 million SLC | 185,082 million SLC | 511 million SLC | Chile |
| 2010s | 244,935 million SLC | 203,374 million SLC | 41,561 million SLC | Chile |
| 2020s | 424,147 million SLC | 261,570 million SLC | 162,576 million SLC | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government), Chile or Paraguay?
- Chile, at 474,776 million SLC against 239,642 million SLC in Paraguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government) between Chile and Paraguay?
- 235,134 million SLC, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Paraguay?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Paraguay rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government)?
- Chile ranks 2nd and Paraguay ranks 4th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.