Costa Rica vs Kenya: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government) over time
- Costa Rica
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 65,888 million SLC against 33,798 million SLC in Costa Rica, a difference of 32,090 million SLC.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.9 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 16th and Kenya ranks 13th of 93 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Kenya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28,930 million SLC | 22,193 million SLC | 6,737 million SLC | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 22,467 million SLC | 47,250 million SLC | 24,783 million SLC | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government), Costa Rica or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 65,888 million SLC against 33,798 million SLC in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government) between Costa Rica and Kenya?
- 32,090 million SLC, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kenya?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Kenya rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government)?
- Costa Rica ranks 16th and Kenya ranks 13th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.