Hungary vs Niger: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government) over time
- Hungary
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 131,878 million SLC against 88,207 million SLC in Hungary, a difference of 43,671 million SLC.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.5 times Hungary's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 12th and Niger ranks 9th of 93 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22,692 million SLC | 66,249 million SLC | 43,557 million SLC | Niger |
| 2020s | 66,963 million SLC | 104,175 million SLC | 37,212 million SLC | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government), Hungary or Niger?
- Niger, at 131,878 million SLC against 88,207 million SLC in Hungary as of 2022.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government) between Hungary and Niger?
- 43,671 million SLC, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Niger?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2022.
- How do Hungary and Niger rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government)?
- Hungary ranks 12th and Niger ranks 9th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.