Kenya vs Malawi: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government) over time
- Kenya
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 94,138 million SLC against 65,888 million SLC in Kenya, a difference of 28,250 million SLC.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.4 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Malawi ahead.
Kenya ranks 13th and Malawi ranks 11th of 93 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,143 million SLC | 5,810 million SLC | 333.35 million SLC | Kenya |
| 2010s | 19,904 million SLC | 39,617 million SLC | 19,713 million SLC | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government), Kenya or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 94,138 million SLC against 65,888 million SLC in Kenya as of 2017.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government) between Kenya and Malawi?
- 28,250 million SLC, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Malawi?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kenya and Malawi rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government)?
- Kenya ranks 13th and Malawi ranks 11th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.