Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government) over time
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 124.64 million SLC against 89 million SLC in Netherlands (Kingdom of the), a difference of 35.64 million SLC.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.4 times Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 58th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 55th of 93 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government), Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 124.64 million SLC against 89 million SLC in Netherlands (Kingdom of the) as of 2017.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government) between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 35.64 million SLC, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2017.
- How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government)?
- Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 58th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 55th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.