Malaysia vs Mexico: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government) over time
- Malaysia
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 1,070 million USD against 614.12 million USD in Malaysia, a difference of 455.88 million USD.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.7 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 3rd and Mexico ranks 2nd of 93 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 690.08 million USD | 374.41 million USD | 315.66 million USD | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 585.24 million USD | 634.63 million USD | 49.39 million USD | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government), Malaysia or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 1,070 million USD against 614.12 million USD in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government) between Malaysia and Mexico?
- 455.88 million USD, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Mexico?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Mexico rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (central government)?
- Malaysia ranks 3rd and Mexico ranks 2nd of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.