Kazakhstan vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 54,447 million SLC against 29,786 million SLC in Kazakhstan, a difference of 24,661 million SLC.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.8 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Sri Lanka ranks 8th of 57 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34,381 million SLC | 22,105 million SLC | 12,276 million SLC | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 47,102 million SLC | 38,675 million SLC | 8,427 million SLC | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government), Kazakhstan or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 54,447 million SLC against 29,786 million SLC in Kazakhstan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government) between Kazakhstan and Sri Lanka?
- 24,661 million SLC, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sri Lanka?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sri Lanka rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Sri Lanka ranks 8th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.