Mauritius vs Portugal: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government) over time
- Mauritius
- Portugal
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 174.88 million SLC against 100.26 million SLC in Portugal, a difference of 74.62 million SLC.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.7 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Portugal ahead.
Mauritius ranks 33rd and Portugal ranks 34th of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 95.52 million SLC | 148.75 million SLC | 53.23 million SLC | Portugal |
| 2020s | 217.69 million SLC | 100.01 million SLC | 117.67 million SLC | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government), Mauritius or Portugal?
- Mauritius, at 174.88 million SLC against 100.26 million SLC in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government) between Mauritius and Portugal?
- 74.62 million SLC, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Portugal?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Portugal rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government)?
- Mauritius ranks 33rd and Portugal ranks 34th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.