Nigeria vs Pakistan: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government) over time
- Nigeria
- Pakistan
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 1.03 million million SLC against 275,751 million SLC in Pakistan, a difference of 752,779 million SLC.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 3.7 times Pakistan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Nigeria ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 4th of 57 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 222,913 million SLC | 100,042 million SLC | 122,871 million SLC | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 692,560 million SLC | 207,666 million SLC | 484,894 million SLC | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government), Nigeria or Pakistan?
- Nigeria, at 1.03 million million SLC against 275,751 million SLC in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government) between Nigeria and Pakistan?
- 752,779 million SLC, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Pakistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Nigeria and Pakistan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government)?
- Nigeria ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 4th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.