Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government) over time
- Hungary
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 400.77 million USD against 219.22 million USD in Hungary, a difference of 181.55 million USD.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.8 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 14th and Sri Lanka ranks 11th of 57 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 315.66 million USD | 113.15 million USD | 202.5 million USD | Hungary |
| 2010s | 108.9 million USD | 306.46 million USD | 197.56 million USD | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government), Hungary or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 400.77 million USD against 219.22 million USD in Hungary as of 2015.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government) between Hungary and Sri Lanka?
- 181.55 million USD, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sri Lanka?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do Hungary and Sri Lanka rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing, capital (general government)?
- Hungary ranks 14th and Sri Lanka ranks 11th of 57 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing, Capital (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.