Russian Federation vs Seychelles: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Russian Federation
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 1.63 % against 1.62 % in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.01 %.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Seychelles ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 84th and Seychelles ranks 82nd of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.6767 % | 3.2 % | 2.52 % | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 1.52 % | 1.49 % | 0.024 % | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 1.45 % | 2.35 % | 0.91 % | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Russian Federation or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 1.63 % against 1.62 % in Russian Federation as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Russian Federation and Seychelles?
- 0.01 %, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Seychelles?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Russian Federation and Seychelles rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Russian Federation ranks 84th and Seychelles ranks 82nd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Share of Total Expenditure. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.