Bangladesh vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Bangladesh
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 573,197 million SLC against 531,370 million SLC in Bangladesh, a difference of 41,827 million SLC.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 15th and Uganda ranks 14th of 166 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29,380 million SLC | 127,441 million SLC | 98,061 million SLC | Uganda |
| 2010s | 153,144 million SLC | 534,193 million SLC | 381,049 million SLC | Uganda |
| 2020s | 371,352 million SLC | 595,843 million SLC | 224,491 million SLC | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Bangladesh or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 573,197 million SLC against 531,370 million SLC in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Bangladesh and Uganda?
- 41,827 million SLC, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Uganda?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Uganda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Bangladesh ranks 15th and Uganda ranks 14th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.