Bhutan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)

Bhutan
7,033 million SLC
in 2024
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
6,765 million SLC
in 2023
Bhutan rank
72nd
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
73rd

Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time

  • Bhutan
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k200120122024

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 7,033 million SLC against 6,765 million SLC in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 268 million SLC.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Bhutan ranks 72nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 73rd of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 1,369 million SLC 2,726 million SLC 1,357 million SLC United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s 4,831 million SLC 2,229 million SLC 2,603 million SLC Bhutan
2020s 7,403 million SLC 5,959 million SLC 1,444 million SLC Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Bhutan or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Bhutan, at 7,033 million SLC against 6,765 million SLC in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Bhutan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
268 million SLC, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
Bhutan ranks 72nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 73rd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/bhutan/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/bhutan/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Bhutan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 3,332 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.