Denmark vs Saudi Arabia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Denmark
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 7,584 million SLC against 7,267 million SLC in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 317 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Denmark ranks 68th and Saudi Arabia ranks 69th of 166 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,526 million SLC | 5,688 million SLC | 2,162 million SLC | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 6,968 million SLC | 4,337 million SLC | 2,631 million SLC | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Denmark or Saudi Arabia?
- Denmark, at 7,584 million SLC against 7,267 million SLC in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Denmark and Saudi Arabia?
- 317 million SLC, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Saudi Arabia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Saudi Arabia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Denmark ranks 68th and Saudi Arabia ranks 69th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.