Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)

Ecuador
157.31 million SLC
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
119.21 million SLC
in 2023
Ecuador rank
129th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
132nd

Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0200400600800200120122024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 157.31 million SLC against 119.21 million SLC in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 38.1 million SLC.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 129th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 132nd of 166 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 258.18 million SLC 67.91 million SLC 190.27 million SLC Ecuador
2010s 463.57 million SLC 121.62 million SLC 341.96 million SLC Ecuador
2020s 175.91 million SLC 110.38 million SLC 65.54 million SLC Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Ecuador or Sao Tome and Principe?
Ecuador, at 157.31 million SLC against 119.21 million SLC in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
38.1 million SLC, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
Ecuador ranks 129th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 132nd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/ecuador/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/ecuador/sao-tome-and-principe/">Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 3,332 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.