Equatorial Guinea vs North Macedonia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 11,927 million SLC against 11,129 million SLC in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 798 million SLC.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 65th and North Macedonia ranks 64th of 166 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13,522 million SLC | 9,328 million SLC | 4,194 million SLC | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 12,618 million SLC | 10,121 million SLC | 2,497 million SLC | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Equatorial Guinea or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 11,927 million SLC against 11,129 million SLC in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Equatorial Guinea and North Macedonia?
- 798 million SLC, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and North Macedonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and North Macedonia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 65th and North Macedonia ranks 64th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.