Equatorial Guinea vs Ukraine: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)

Equatorial Guinea
11,129 million SLC
in 2022
Ukraine
13,463 million SLC
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
65th
Ukraine rank
62nd

Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Ukraine
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k200120122024

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 13,463 million SLC against 11,129 million SLC in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 2,334 million SLC.

That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 65th and Ukraine ranks 62nd of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 19,361 million SLC 7,479 million SLC 11,882 million SLC Equatorial Guinea
2010s 12,908 million SLC 10,793 million SLC 2,116 million SLC Equatorial Guinea
2020s 12,618 million SLC 13,655 million SLC 1,037 million SLC Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Equatorial Guinea or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 13,463 million SLC against 11,129 million SLC in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Equatorial Guinea and Ukraine?
2,334 million SLC, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Ukraine?
10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Ukraine rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 65th and Ukraine ranks 62nd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Ukraine: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/equatorial-guinea/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/equatorial-guinea/ukraine/">Equatorial Guinea vs Ukraine: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 3,332 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.