Ethiopia vs Poland: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Ethiopia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 23,927 million SLC against 23,182 million SLC in Ethiopia, a difference of 745 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Poland ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 55th and Poland ranks 54th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,095 million SLC | 6,788 million SLC | 4,693 million SLC | Poland |
| 2010s | 13,609 million SLC | 8,255 million SLC | 5,354 million SLC | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 16,562 million SLC | 16,890 million SLC | 328.35 million SLC | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Ethiopia or Poland?
- Poland, at 23,927 million SLC against 23,182 million SLC in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Ethiopia and Poland?
- 745 million SLC, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Poland?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Poland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Ethiopia ranks 55th and Poland ranks 54th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.