Guinea-Bissau vs North Macedonia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 12,488 million SLC against 11,927 million SLC in North Macedonia, a difference of 561 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 63rd and North Macedonia ranks 64th of 166 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10,518 million SLC | 9,328 million SLC | 1,190 million SLC | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 11,864 million SLC | 10,676 million SLC | 1,188 million SLC | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Guinea-Bissau or North Macedonia?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 12,488 million SLC against 11,927 million SLC in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Guinea-Bissau and North Macedonia?
- 561 million SLC, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and North Macedonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and North Macedonia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 63rd and North Macedonia ranks 64th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.