Guyana vs Iceland: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Guyana
- Iceland
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 34,573 million SLC against 30,725 million SLC in Iceland, a difference of 3,848 million SLC.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iceland ahead.
Guyana ranks 46th and Iceland ranks 48th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,903 million SLC | 14,859 million SLC | 9,956 million SLC | Iceland |
| 2010s | 17,740 million SLC | 18,822 million SLC | 1,082 million SLC | Iceland |
| 2020s | 30,634 million SLC | 24,464 million SLC | 6,170 million SLC | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Guyana or Iceland?
- Guyana, at 34,573 million SLC against 30,725 million SLC in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Guyana and Iceland?
- 3,848 million SLC, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Iceland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Iceland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Guyana ranks 46th and Iceland ranks 48th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.