Honduras vs Malaysia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Honduras
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 7,124 million SLC against 5,415 million SLC in Honduras, a difference of 1,709 million SLC.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.3 times Honduras's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Honduras ranks 74th and Malaysia ranks 71st of 166 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,457 million SLC | 5,577 million SLC | 4,121 million SLC | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 2,002 million SLC | 6,880 million SLC | 4,878 million SLC | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 4,342 million SLC | 5,344 million SLC | 1,002 million SLC | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Honduras or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 7,124 million SLC against 5,415 million SLC in Honduras as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Honduras and Malaysia?
- 1,709 million SLC, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Malaysia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Honduras and Malaysia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Honduras ranks 74th and Malaysia ranks 71st of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.