India vs Nigeria: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- India
- Nigeria
How they compare
India currently reports 1.46 million million SLC against 1.01 million million SLC in Nigeria, a difference of 446,010 million SLC.
That makes India's figure about 1.4 times Nigeria's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.
India ranks 5th and Nigeria ranks 7th of 166 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 490,747 million SLC | 101,329 million SLC | 389,419 million SLC | India |
| 2010s | 1.24 million million SLC | 99,206 million SLC | 1.14 million million SLC | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), India or Nigeria?
- India, at 1.46 million million SLC against 1.01 million million SLC in Nigeria as of 2018.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between India and Nigeria?
- 446,010 million SLC, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Nigeria?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do India and Nigeria rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- India ranks 5th and Nigeria ranks 7th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.