Kazakhstan vs Lebanon: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 190,600 million SLC against 172,687 million SLC in Kazakhstan, a difference of 17,913 million SLC.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Lebanon ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 29th and Lebanon ranks 28th of 166 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68,451 million SLC | 31,087 million SLC | 37,364 million SLC | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 162,699 million SLC | 72,986 million SLC | 89,713 million SLC | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 290,795 million SLC | 89,007 million SLC | 201,788 million SLC | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Kazakhstan or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 190,600 million SLC against 172,687 million SLC in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Kazakhstan and Lebanon?
- 17,913 million SLC, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Lebanon?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Kazakhstan and Lebanon rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 29th and Lebanon ranks 28th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.