Kenya vs Mexico: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Kenya
- Mexico
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 93,090 million SLC against 84,279 million SLC in Mexico, a difference of 8,811 million SLC.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mexico ahead.
Kenya ranks 37th and Mexico ranks 39th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13,165 million SLC | 60,872 million SLC | 47,707 million SLC | Mexico |
| 2010s | 37,713 million SLC | 85,313 million SLC | 47,600 million SLC | Mexico |
| 2020s | 71,523 million SLC | 66,182 million SLC | 5,341 million SLC | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Kenya or Mexico?
- Kenya, at 93,090 million SLC against 84,279 million SLC in Mexico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Kenya and Mexico?
- 8,811 million SLC, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mexico?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Mexico rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Kenya ranks 37th and Mexico ranks 39th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.