Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Myanmar: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Micronesia (Federated States of)
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 893,929 million SLC against 3.56 million SLC in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 893,925 million SLC.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 11th and Myanmar ranks 9th of 11 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Micronesia (Federated States of) or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 893,929 million SLC against 3.56 million SLC in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Micronesia (Federated States of) and Myanmar?
- 893,925 million SLC, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and Myanmar?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and Myanmar rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 11th and Myanmar ranks 9th of 11 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.