Nepal vs Thailand: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Nepal
- Thailand
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 198,591 million SLC against 197,940 million SLC in Thailand, a difference of 651 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Thailand ahead.
Nepal ranks 25th and Thailand ranks 26th of 166 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,743 million SLC | 88,192 million SLC | 82,448 million SLC | Thailand |
| 2010s | 44,561 million SLC | 175,645 million SLC | 131,084 million SLC | Thailand |
| 2020s | 90,312 million SLC | 219,103 million SLC | 128,791 million SLC | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Nepal or Thailand?
- Nepal, at 198,591 million SLC against 197,940 million SLC in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Nepal and Thailand?
- 651 million SLC, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Thailand?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Thailand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Nepal ranks 25th and Thailand ranks 26th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.