Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)

Syrian Arab Republic
82,338 million SLC
in 2022
United Republic of Tanzania
883,876 million SLC
in 2024
Syrian Arab Republic rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time

  • Syrian Arab Republic
  • United Republic of Tanzania
01.0M2.0M3.0M200220132024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 883,876 million SLC against 82,338 million SLC in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 801,538 million SLC.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 10.7 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Syrian Arab Republic ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 11 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syrian Arab Republic United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 24,602 million SLC 102,792 million SLC 78,189 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 35,374 million SLC 315,233 million SLC 279,859 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 60,257 million SLC 657,800 million SLC 597,544 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Syrian Arab Republic or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 883,876 million SLC against 82,338 million SLC in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
801,538 million SLC, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
How do Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 11 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/syrian-arab-republic-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Syrian Arab Republic vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 3,332 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.