Indonesia vs Poland: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Indonesia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 4,488 million USD against 4,353 million USD in Indonesia, a difference of 135 million USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Poland ahead.
Indonesia ranks 7th and Poland ranks 6th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,361 million USD | 2,477 million USD | 1,116 million USD | Poland |
| 2010s | 2,779 million USD | 2,300 million USD | 479.02 million USD | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 3,339 million USD | 3,531 million USD | 192.56 million USD | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Indonesia or Poland?
- Poland, at 4,488 million USD against 4,353 million USD in Indonesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Indonesia and Poland?
- 135 million USD, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Poland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Indonesia and Poland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Indonesia ranks 7th and Poland ranks 6th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.