Papua New Guinea vs Yemen: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Yemen
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 124.73 million USD against 113.89 million USD in Yemen, a difference of 10.84 million USD.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Yemen ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 93rd and Yemen ranks 96th of 166 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.3 million USD | 116.01 million USD | 73.71 million USD | Yemen |
| 2010s | 81.47 million USD | 98.02 million USD | 16.54 million USD | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Papua New Guinea or Yemen?
- Papua New Guinea, at 124.73 million USD against 113.89 million USD in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Papua New Guinea and Yemen?
- 10.84 million USD, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Yemen?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Yemen rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 93rd and Yemen ranks 96th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.