Poland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)

Poland
4,488 million USD
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
336.68 million USD
in 2024
Poland rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
4th

Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time

  • Poland
  • United Republic of Tanzania
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200120122024

How they compare

Poland currently reports 4,488 million USD against 336.68 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 4,151 million USD.

That makes Poland's figure about 13.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 166 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 2,557 million USD 114.57 million USD 2,442 million USD Poland
2010s 2,300 million USD 154.45 million USD 2,145 million USD Poland
2020s 3,531 million USD 485.89 million USD 3,045 million USD Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Poland or United Republic of Tanzania?
Poland, at 4,488 million USD against 336.68 million USD in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Poland and United Republic of Tanzania?
4,151 million USD, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and United Republic of Tanzania?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Poland and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
Poland ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 4th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-us-2015-prices/poland/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-fishing-central-government-expenditure-value-us-2015-prices/poland/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Poland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
180 places, 3,332 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.