Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 5,597 million USD against 44.88 million USD in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 5,552 million USD.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 124.7 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 11 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 5,597 million USD against 44.88 million USD in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2021.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Russian Federation?
- 5,552 million USD, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Russian Federation?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2007.
- How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Russian Federation rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 6th of 11 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.