Botswana vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Botswana
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 222.11 million USD against 221.49 million USD in Botswana, a difference of 0.62 million USD.
Across all 14 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 77th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 166 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 132.55 million USD | 671.93 million USD | 539.39 million USD | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 215.05 million USD | 422.93 million USD | 207.88 million USD | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 195.5 million USD | 242.59 million USD | 47.09 million USD | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Botswana or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 222.11 million USD against 221.49 million USD in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Botswana and New Zealand?
- 0.62 million USD, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and New Zealand?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Botswana ranks 77th and New Zealand ranks 76th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.