Côte d'Ivoire vs Poland: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 5,692 million USD against 227.53 million USD in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 5,464 million USD.
That makes Poland's figure about 25.0 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 4th of 3 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.87 million USD | 3,954 million USD | 3,858 million USD | Poland |
| 2010s | 175.47 million USD | 2,533 million USD | 2,358 million USD | Poland |
| 2020s | 258.11 million USD | 4,065 million USD | 3,807 million USD | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Côte d'Ivoire or Poland?
- Poland, at 5,692 million USD against 227.53 million USD in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Côte d'Ivoire and Poland?
- 5,464 million USD, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Poland?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Poland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 4th of 3 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.