Malaysia vs Romania: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) over time
- Malaysia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 1,566 million USD against 1,557 million USD in Malaysia, a difference of 9 million USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 27th and Romania ranks 26th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,554 million USD | 1,415 million USD | 139.24 million USD | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 1,928 million USD | 1,569 million USD | 358.91 million USD | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 1,130 million USD | 1,671 million USD | 540.8 million USD | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure), Malaysia or Romania?
- Romania, at 1,566 million USD against 1,557 million USD in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) between Malaysia and Romania?
- 9 million USD, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Romania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Romania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure)?
- Malaysia ranks 27th and Romania ranks 26th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.