Malta vs Russian Federation: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) over time
- Malta
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 1.21 % against 1.12 % in Malta, a difference of 0.09 %.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Malta ranks 57th and Russian Federation ranks 54th of 101 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.97 % | 1.34 % | 0.6244 % | Malta |
| 2010s | 1.32 % | 1.32 % | 0.002 % | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 0.93 % | 1.14 % | 0.205 % | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure), Malta or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 1.21 % against 1.12 % in Malta as of 2021.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) between Malta and Russian Federation?
- 0.09 %, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Russian Federation?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Malta and Russian Federation rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)?
- Malta ranks 57th and Russian Federation ranks 54th of 101 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) — Share of Total Expenditure. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.