Afghanistan vs Poland: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) over time
- Afghanistan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 22,634 million SLC against 19,621 million SLC in Afghanistan, a difference of 3,013 million SLC.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 35th and Poland ranks 34th of 102 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,633 million SLC | 10,534 million SLC | 2,099 million SLC | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 20,574 million SLC | 9,229 million SLC | 11,345 million SLC | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure), Afghanistan or Poland?
- Poland, at 22,634 million SLC against 19,621 million SLC in Afghanistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) between Afghanistan and Poland?
- 3,013 million SLC, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Afghanistan and Poland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)?
- Afghanistan ranks 35th and Poland ranks 34th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.