Angola vs Thailand: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) over time
- Angola
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 197,940 million SLC against 140,961 million SLC in Angola, a difference of 56,979 million SLC.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.4 times Angola's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 19th and Thailand ranks 16th of 102 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32,230 million SLC | 90,281 million SLC | 58,052 million SLC | Thailand |
| 2010s | 47,475 million SLC | 175,645 million SLC | 128,170 million SLC | Thailand |
| 2020s | 114,585 million SLC | 219,103 million SLC | 104,518 million SLC | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure), Angola or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 197,940 million SLC against 140,961 million SLC in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) between Angola and Thailand?
- 56,979 million SLC, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Thailand?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Thailand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)?
- Angola ranks 19th and Thailand ranks 16th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.