Armenia vs South Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) over time
- Armenia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 67,415 million SLC against 58,359 million SLC in South Sudan, a difference of 9,056 million SLC.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times South Sudan's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 24th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 102 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30,798 million SLC | 240.48 million SLC | 30,557 million SLC | Armenia |
| 2020s | 48,796 million SLC | 23,266 million SLC | 25,530 million SLC | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure), Armenia or South Sudan?
- Armenia, at 67,415 million SLC against 58,359 million SLC in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) between Armenia and South Sudan?
- 9,056 million SLC, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and South Sudan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and South Sudan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)?
- Armenia ranks 24th and South Sudan ranks 26th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.