Australia vs New Caledonia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) over time
- Australia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 6,400 million SLC against 5,421 million SLC in New Caledonia, a difference of 979 million SLC.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 46th and New Caledonia ranks 48th of 102 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4,231 million SLC | 5,324 million SLC | 1,093 million SLC | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 4,699 million SLC | 5,421 million SLC | 721.9 million SLC | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure), Australia or New Caledonia?
- Australia, at 6,400 million SLC against 5,421 million SLC in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) between Australia and New Caledonia?
- 979 million SLC, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Caledonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Australia and New Caledonia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)?
- Australia ranks 46th and New Caledonia ranks 48th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.