Denmark vs Ukraine: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) over time
- Denmark
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 13,890 million SLC against 7,584 million SLC in Denmark, a difference of 6,306 million SLC.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.8 times Denmark's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 40th and Ukraine ranks 38th of 102 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,057 million SLC | 5,120 million SLC | 3,063 million SLC | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 3,392 million SLC | 8,933 million SLC | 5,540 million SLC | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 6,968 million SLC | 13,121 million SLC | 6,153 million SLC | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure), Denmark or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 13,890 million SLC against 7,584 million SLC in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) between Denmark and Ukraine?
- 6,306 million SLC, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Ukraine?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Ukraine rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)?
- Denmark ranks 40th and Ukraine ranks 38th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.