Mongolia vs Myanmar: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) over time
- Mongolia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 826,116 million SLC against 679,095 million SLC in Mongolia, a difference of 147,021 million SLC.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 13th and Myanmar ranks 12th of 102 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,718 million SLC | 117,794 million SLC | 105,076 million SLC | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 138,810 million SLC | 632,645 million SLC | 493,835 million SLC | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 337,085 million SLC | 826,116 million SLC | 489,031 million SLC | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure), Mongolia or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 826,116 million SLC against 679,095 million SLC in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) between Mongolia and Myanmar?
- 147,021 million SLC, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Myanmar?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Myanmar rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)?
- Mongolia ranks 13th and Myanmar ranks 12th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.