Timor-Leste vs Türkiye: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) over time
- Timor-Leste
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 279,878 million SLC against 21.23 million SLC in Timor-Leste, a difference of 279,857 million SLC.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.
Timor-Leste ranks 6th and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 6 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Timor-Leste | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.77 million SLC | 11,248 million SLC | 11,217 million SLC | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 40.32 million SLC | 23,905 million SLC | 23,865 million SLC | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 16.69 million SLC | 72,683 million SLC | 72,666 million SLC | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure), Timor-Leste or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 279,878 million SLC against 21.23 million SLC in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) between Timor-Leste and Türkiye?
- 279,857 million SLC, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Timor-Leste and Türkiye?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Timor-Leste and Türkiye rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)?
- Timor-Leste ranks 6th and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 6 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.