Belarus vs Czechia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) over time
- Belarus
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 1,773 million USD against 1,620 million USD in Belarus, a difference of 153 million USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Czechia ahead.
Belarus ranks 26th and Czechia ranks 23rd of 102 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,672 million USD | 1,893 million USD | 220.93 million USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 1,322 million USD | 1,837 million USD | 514.93 million USD | Czechia |
| 2020s | 1,408 million USD | 2,078 million USD | 670.69 million USD | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure), Belarus or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 1,773 million USD against 1,620 million USD in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) between Belarus and Czechia?
- 153 million USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Czechia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Czechia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)?
- Belarus ranks 26th and Czechia ranks 23rd of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.