Latvia vs Mongolia: Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) over time
- Latvia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 140.8 million USD against 132.39 million USD in Latvia, a difference of 8.41 million USD.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 72nd and Mongolia ranks 71st of 102 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 180.47 million USD | 30.21 million USD | 150.26 million USD | Latvia |
| 2010s | 141.2 million USD | 74.54 million USD | 66.66 million USD | Latvia |
| 2020s | 142.66 million USD | 82.16 million USD | 60.5 million USD | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure), Latvia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 140.8 million USD against 132.39 million USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) between Latvia and Mongolia?
- 8.41 million USD, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mongolia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Mongolia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure)?
- Latvia ranks 72nd and Mongolia ranks 71st of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Agriculture, forestry, fishing (general government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.